John Hallquist Lithen vs Andrey Chepelev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, John Hallquist Lithen has a slight edge with a 42.48% win rate on second serve points compared to Andrey Chepelev's 39.22%.
• Return Game Stats: Chepelev outperforms Lithen in return games, winning 46.92% of opponent's second serve points against Lithen's 43.75%. For first serve returns, Chepelev leads slightly with 30.76%, while Lithen holds 28.74%.
• Under Pressure: When saving breakpoints, Lithen edges marginally ahead at 50.77% compared to Chepelev’s 49.90%.
• Overall Performance: Over the last year, Chepelev has a stronger win percentage at 64.13% relative to Lithen's 57.38%. What can we infer about their consistency over the year? It suggests Chepelev might be more reliable.
• Best Surface: Lithen shines on Hard courts with a 75% success rate. Chepelev is most successful on Clay, also with a 75% win rate.
• Player Level: Both players have competed largely in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, where Chepelev has a higher win percentage.
• Opponent Quality: Lithen has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 291.2, compared to Chepelev's 470.84. What does this reveal about their competitive experiences? Lithen has potentially gained more high-level match experience.
• Deciding Set Performance: Chepelev shows resilience in deciding sets, winning 58% of them, while Lithen has only managed a 27% success rate.
• Break Point Conversion: Chepelev has a higher breakpoint conversion at 37.86% when compared to Lithen's 35.76%.

Editorial Prediction (November 20, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents a fascinating clash of styles and strengths. Andrey Chepelev has exhibited a superior return game, particularly on opponents' second serves, which could provide him with a significant tactical advantage.

While John Hallquist Lithen might boast a slightly better performance under pressure, it is Chepelev's experience in decisive moments, showcased by his impressive 58% win rate in deciding sets, that is telling.

Both players have excelled in distinct environments, with Lithen thriving on Hard courts, whereas Chepelev favors Clay surfaces. This match's outcome may hinge on the playing surface and how it complements each player's game.

Given the recent statistics and overall performance metrics, Andrey Chepelev, with his formidable return game and superior performance in crucial match moments, is likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.